Comment: More research is needed earlier than the Rules of Golf must be changed

LPGA Master instructor Kiran Kanwar PhD argues that, in response to the most recent rule change surrounding golf balls which are used by elite golfers, extra questions must be asked before amendments are made.

The Rules of Golf have advanced from the original 13 to the current 25. They also include many stipulations for golf clubs and balls and what design and efficiency requirements they must meet. In 1952, the Rules code turned, for the first time, the combined effort of the USGA (the governing physique for golf within the USA) and The R&A (the governing physique for golf in the rest of the world). A potted historical past of the more recent golf Rules states that since 1985 the two governing our bodies, whereas ‘responding to rapid developments’, discovered that, ‘an organic sample emerged’ which concerned a ‘major update to the Rules about each 30 years’.

Every 30 years? Major updates? What constitutes ‘major’ and is that even throughout the mandate of The USGA and The R&A, if, certainly, such a mandate even exists?

According to a page on, the ‘international sports federations’ are answerable for the integrity of their sport on the international stage, and, moreover, ‘have the responsibility and responsibility to manage and to observe the everyday running of the world’s varied sports disciplines…’ Furthermore, every federation ‘governs its sport at world stage and ensures its promotion and development’ and should ‘monitor the everyday administration of their sports and assure the common organisation of competitions in addition to respect for the principles of truthful play.’

So the vital thing phrases right here appear to be ‘integrity’, ‘promotion and development’ and ‘fair play’. However, the USGA itself states that :’A core perform of the USGA is to write and interpret the Rules of Golf along side our worldwide companion, The R&A.’

Who, then, decides what an international sports federation actually ought to be responsible for? And, bottom line, who do any golf Rules adjustments benefit? Every single golfer on the earth or just a few?

Major guidelines modifications, despite the assertion on the USGA web site claiming that they are made every 30 years, have become as prolific as golf balls lost in ponds on the best sides of fairways.

Remember when it was not allowed by the Rules to ‘anchor a putter when making a stroke’ (2016)? Or when golfers could select between flagstick in or flagstick out whereas putting (2019)?

These are simply two examples of the a number of Rules changes made in fast succession and their primary impact, regardless of their intent, was to discombobulate millions of golfers.

What rationale do the governing bodies provide for Rules changes? Most importantly, what research do they base their required modifications on? According to one source: ‘The argument towards anchored putters is predicated on the assumption that affixing the membership to one’s physique is an illegitimate means of gaining management of the placing stroke. The swinging motion consistent in all sides of golf is diminished.’ The inquiries to ask can be: a) is controlling a swing motion now additionally to be ruled by the Rules? b) is there any research to point that an anchored stroke would supply any direct benefit to a golfer?

What the anchored stroke serves to do is create a lower fulcrum for the stroke than, for instance, an all arms stroke may. With a decrease fulcrum or center of rotation of the putter shaft, the stroke can be more of a pendulum with a really particular bottom-of-the-arc, whereas with a movement in which the arms move a fairly vertical putter shaft again and through, there can be a slightly extra extended low point of the arc with, presumably, a greater margin inside which to err. Of course that could presumably be a hypothesis, however one which is extremely straightforward for the governing our bodies of the world of golf to conduct meaningful inferential statistics on.

Similarly, the flagstick in or out rule was based mostly on the rationale that it ‘should generally speed up play … When the gamers did not have caddies, the earlier Rule may lead to appreciable delay.’ No research was conducted on that subject either. While there were a minimal of three impartial researchers who studied whether or not ‘pin in’ or ‘pin out’ was better for golfers (with differing results), no analysis was carried out on the fundamental premise of whether or not, indeed, leaving the flagstick in would speed up play, for which golfers, and by how much. A main Rules change that discomfited thousands was made on the basis of a mere ‘generally’ or ‘considerable’?

Now we come to the most recent proposed rule change, one of many that are hurtling towards golfers at the speed of sunshine somewhat than the tortoise-slow velocity of ‘every 30 years’.

Some background first. The USGA and R&A collectively launched the Distance Insights venture in May 2018. According to the then CEO of The USGA, Mike Davis: “The matter of elevated distance and its effects on the sport have been mentioned for nicely over a century. We imagine that now is the time to look at this subject by way of a very extensive and lengthy lens, knowing it’s critical to the way forward for the sport.”

Did such a challenge even make any sense? Absolutely. As international populations enhance and land becomes exponentially dearer to amass for use by just a few, sustainable golf is important.

According to its press launch made at the time of launching the venture, ‘Among the various topics to be explored, the organisations will search distance-related knowledge on pace of play, golf course development and upkeep practices, the evolution of kit, golf course design and player enjoyment and participation.’ All extraordinarily important and laudable issues.

So, what did the joint governing our bodies do with all the data they gathered? In February 2021 they released a communication that said they’d further establish the ‘persistent will increase in hitting distance over time’ and likewise the way to ‘enhance the reward of a central impact.’ Eventually by June 2022 they fine-tuned their interest specifically to increased clubhead velocity – because it applies to the longest hitters – and various traits of drivers.

Finally, in March 2023, the 2 governing bodies at a joint press convention, made a statement about – await it – a ‘model native rule’ about (of all things) how golf balls that might be used by elite golfers can be restricted from travelling additional than an general distance of 317 yards. Whaaat?

The Acushnet firm, maker of the well-known Titleist model of golf balls, reacted with: “This bifurcation would divide golf between elite and leisure play, add confusion, and break the linkage that’s part of the game’s enduring fabric.” They additionally acknowledged that the course enjoying length as set up by the PGA Tour to go well with the ever-increasing distances skilled golfers hit the ball had only increased by less than 100 yards prior to now 20 years.

The exhausting questions that ought to have been asked (and answered through relevant research) earlier than the golf world was thrown yet one more curve ball should have been, based mostly on their very own avowed issues, how the following might be affected:

· Pace of play

· Golf course construction and maintenance

· Golf course design

· Player enjoyment and participation

Some of the answers are apparent. Some questions have been answered by way of market surveys by a 3rd party service supplier. None have been analysed by way of actual quantitative research which may have assessed not simply the above matters but additionally some proposed golf balls engineered to duplicate the required standards of the future. How would such balls truly travel with respect to not simply general distance but also carry distance in addition to direction? Suitable research may even have assessed how the new golf balls would affect strategy photographs and putts, underneath quite a lot of golf course and weather situations.

While the overarching intentions of the two governing our bodies are, indeed, essential and relevant, the question at all times returns to their implementation.

Do they use the companies of an sufficient variety of research-scientists? Is their Rules planning based on stakeholder discussions and qualitative market analysis alone? Do they conduct any evidence-based research? A analysis scientist would ask every attainable query from the ‘ridiculous to the sublime’, with a quantity of being:

1. What is the rationale behind any proposed change?

2. Would the change be fair?

3. For whom?

4. Does the research indicate that the above considerations are even legitimate?

5. Might there be alternative ideas that would scale back inconvenience and prices for all stakeholders?

Ultimately, a governing physique of a sport have to be an organisation that fosters the growth of the game it governs, the integrity and equity that help such progress and, in the present era, the sustainability of the planet and its peoples when pertinent. All via best-practices as supported by considerable analysis.

LPGA Master teacher Kiran Kanwar has a PhD in kinesiology (biomechanics and anatomy) and wrote a thesis on causes of golf swing-related injuries. Kiran is also chair of Stanton University’s golf department


Prestwick to host Stark County Amateur Golf Championship in July

Entries are now being accepted for the 89th Stark County Amateur Golf Championship set for July 22 and 23 at Ohio Prestwick Country Club.The...

RiverWatch Golf Club Has New Owner and New Name – WJLE Radio

March 23, 2023By: Dwayne PageRiverWatch Golf Club has a brand new proprietor and can quickly have a brand new name!Steve Smith, owner of Tootsies...

This new southern retreat is Johnson Wagner’s favorite golf destination

Being a professional usually helps get the invite to a number of the most outstanding golf...

- Advertisement -

Prestwick to host Stark County Amateur Golf Championship in July

Entries are now being accepted for the 89th Stark County Amateur Golf Championship set for July 22 and 23...

RiverWatch Golf Club Has New Owner and New Name – WJLE Radio

March 23, 2023By: Dwayne PageRiverWatch Golf Club has a brand new proprietor and can quickly have a brand new...

This new southern retreat is Johnson Wagner’s favorite golf destination

Being a professional usually helps get the invite to a number...

Shrewsbury Golf Club trend show goes with a swing

Shrewsbury Golf Club swung into action raising greater than £500 for charity at their annual ladies golf style show. The...

Performance consistency at Chichester Golf Club

Located within the stunning county of West Sussex, Chichester Golf Club is positioned just two miles south of the City. The...

Expose your thoughts


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here